Michigan test archive

2002 Michigan State Police Patrol Vehicle Test

Mopar comes back, the pursuit Camaro leaves, and two new cars fall short of their braking minimums — one of them by four hundredths.

Fifteen vehicles ran in September 2001, and the preface announces an ending and two beginnings. Mopar is back in the police car business — the Dodge Intrepid police package made its official debut, a year after it was tested as an unpublished prototype. This was the last year of the pursuit Camaro. And General Motors brought a non-published prototype Tahoe, which the book’s preface calls “of particular interest because it would be a pursuit rated SUV for the future”. The Tahoe PPV entered the police category three model years later; the book does not say whether this prototype was its forerunner.

The Intrepid announced itself properly. It ran 135 mph — faster than either Police Interceptor in the test, and faster than any American police sedan in Michigan’s published results since 1996 — reached 60 in 8.72 seconds and lapped Grattan in 1:42.83, within three tenths of the Ford. Then it posted a braking score of 25.92 ft/s² against a stated minimum requirement of 25.96. It fell short on its debut by four hundredths of a foot per second squared.

It was not alone. Ford brought both the 2002 and the 2003 Police Interceptor — the following year’s car, tested twelve months early. The 2003 car scored 25.03 against a 25.87 minimum, and its story is worse than the number: its ABS failed twice during the handling test, Ford and MSP staff could not diagnose why, and on the fourth run the driver was instructed to continue with the system inactive.

A change in how braking is scored. In 2002 the slowest deceleration rate in each phase is discarded, the phase average is taken from the remaining five stops, and the final score rests on the best ten of twelve; the 2001 book averaged all twelve, and the 2005 and 2006 books do so again. As in 2001, the brake sheets print a minimum for most police-category cars — 25.87 ft/s² for the Police Interceptors, 25.96 for the Impala and Intrepid, 26.05 for the Camaro; the Hummer’s and the special-service vehicles’ sheets print none. And one accommodation is recorded plainly: the Hummer’s brake heat-up runs were conducted at 75 mph instead of the standard 90, because the vehicle could not reach 90.

The police category

Source: 2002 Model Year Police Vehicle Evaluation Program. Acceleration, top speed and braking at the DaimlerChrysler Proving Grounds, September 15, 2001; dynamics at Grattan Raceway. ** = electronic speed limiter. Braking is the best ten of twelve 60-to-0 impending-skid stops. All vehicles ran with a clean roof.
Vehicle0–60 (s)0–100 (s)Top speed¼ mileDynamicsBrakes (ft/s²)Minimum60–0 (ft)
Chevrolet Camaro (automatic)5.6913.48159 **14.14 @ 102.481:37.1427.5126.05140.8
Ford Police Interceptor (2002)8.4223.34129 **16.43 @ 86.531:42.5527.6725.87139.9
Dodge Intrepid8.7224.27135 **16.68 @ 85.481:42.8325.9225.96149.4
Ford Police Interceptor (2003)8.8423.83127 **16.72 @ 85.801:42.6025.0325.87154.7
Chevrolet Impala9.2126.27124 **17.04 @ 83.651:44.6526.0625.96148.6
AM General Hummer20.03never reached83 **21.90 @ 62.402:01.5522.28—173.8

Gold row: the last pursuit Camaro. Its quarter mile, 14.14 seconds at 102.48 mph, was the quickest by a car in the books held here to that point, 0.11 quicker than the 2001 six-speed Camaro’s 14.25, and it ran 5.69 to 60 and 159 mph. Its braking improved from 26.79 in the first phase to 28.23 in the second, for a score of 27.51, just behind the 2002 Interceptor’s 27.67.

The two braking misses are the year’s substance. The Intrepid came within 0.04 ft/s² of its requirement, which on the stopping distance is a matter of inches; the 2003 Police Interceptor missed by 0.84 and needed 154.7 feet, the longest stop of any sedan on the page. The book does not connect that result with the ABS faults recorded during the car’s dynamics runs, which came later, at Grattan.

The Hummer returned, and got worse. Where 2001 gave 18.55 seconds to 60 and 88 mph with a limiter fitted, this year it recorded 20.03 and 83, lapped 2:01.55, and needed a projected 173.8 feet to stop from 60. Its heat-up stops had to be run at 75 mph because it could not reach the standard 90.

See the original pages: the summary of acceleration, top speed and brake testing in the 2002 book
Scan of the two summary pages from the 2002 Michigan State Police test book: acceleration, top speed, quarter mile and braking for six vehicles
“Summary of Acceleration, Top Speed, and Brake Testing”, the two pages side by side. Michigan State Police, 2002 Model Year Police Vehicle Evaluation Program, PDF pages 43 and 44 (printed pages 28 and 29). Open full size.

The special-service vehicles

Source: 2002 Model Year Police Vehicle Evaluation Program, Appendix II. These vehicles were not driven through the dynamics test; the manufacturers state they are not suitable for high-speed, pursuit or emergency driving. ** = electronic speed limiter. N/A = did not reach 100 mph.
Vehicle0–60 (s)0–100 (s)Top speed¼ mileBrakes (ft/s²)60–0 (ft)Fade?
Chevrolet Tahoe (2WD)8.62N/A98 **16.66 @ 83.6824.59157.5No
Chevrolet Tahoe (4WD)8.73N/A98 **16.84 @ 82.4524.49158.1No
Dodge Durango (2WD)9.2330.19114 **17.17 @ 80.2025.05154.6Yes
Ford Crown Victoria (long wheelbase)9.9029.60104 **17.48 @ 82.5827.33141.7No
Dodge Durango (4WD)10.0834.93112 **17.66 @ 77.3824.12160.6Yes
Ford Excursion (4WD)10.31N/A93 **17.73 @ 79.5823.50164.8No
Ford Expedition (4WD)10.5836.27105 **17.84 @ 79.4323.57164.3No
Ford Explorer (4WD)11.0734.31105 **18.16 @ 78.6027.47140.9No

The final column is the book’s fade question. Both Dodge Durangos answered yes, and the brake sheets show it: the two-wheel-drive car’s last two printed stops fell to 24.13 and 23.33 ft/s² from a first-phase best of 26.68. In the earlier books held here that print an answer for each vehicle (1978, 1980, 1984, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996 and 2001), every answer is no; the 2005 book has two more yes answers, for the Explorer 2WD and the four-wheel-drive Tahoe.

Two other results are worth noticing. The Explorer, with the 4.6 V8, is the slowest vehicle in this table to 60 mph and has the best brakes in it, 27.47 ft/s² and 140.9 feet — better than four of the six police-category cars. And a long-wheelbase Crown Victoria appears for the first time in the books held here, stopping in 141.7 feet, classified special service.

See the original pages: the special-service summary in the 2002 book
Scan of the two special-service summary pages from Appendix II of the 2002 Michigan State Police test book: acceleration, top speed, quarter mile and braking for eight vehicles
“Summary of Acceleration, Top Speed, and Brake Testing” for the vehicles headed “Not designed for high speed or pursuit driving”, the two pages side by side. Michigan State Police, 2002 Model Year Police Vehicle Evaluation Program, PDF pages 97 and 98 (printed pages 82 and 83). Open full size.
Vehicle dynamics at Grattan — every lap, every driver

Sixteen timed laps per vehicle over the two-mile course, four drivers, score being the average of the fastest twelve. Testing began three hours late after morning rain; the track dried and the full programme was completed in the afternoon.

Lap times as printed in the report.
VehicleDriverLap 1Lap 2Lap 3Lap 4
Chevrolet Camaro (automatic)overall average 1:37.14
Wilson1:36.051:36.201:36.681:36.60
Schutter1:37.971:38.871:39.291:38.99
Flegel1:37.201:38.361:37.741:39.00
Clark1:37.111:38.291:36.811:36.68
Ford Police Interceptor (2002)overall average 1:42.55
Wilson1:42.361:42.571:42.341:42.96
Schutter1:42.831:43.041:43.021:43.44
Flegel1:42.361:42.241:42.381:42.71
Clark1:42.761:42.091:43.021:43.60
Ford Police Interceptor (2003)overall average 1:42.60
Wilson1:43.331:43.201:43.111:43.35
Schutter1:42.401:42.431:42.561:42.48
Flegel1:43.051:43.091:43.051:43.20
Clark1:43.141:42.031:41.861:42.03
Dodge Intrepidoverall average 1:42.83
Wilson1:43.191:42.331:43.521:43.76
Schutter1:44.051:43.631:43.781:43.74
Flegel1:42.571:42.251:42.541:42.79
Clark1:42.911:42.581:42.921:42.76
Chevrolet Impalaoverall average 1:44.65
Wilson1:44.761:44.531:45.611:45.03
Schutter1:44.871:44.771:44.411:44.85
Flegel1:44.871:44.401:44.671:44.50
Clark1:44.901:44.581:44.601:45.13
AM General Hummeroverall average 2:01.55
Wilson2:02.142:02.022:01.632:02.38
Schutter2:02.442:03.692:03.062:02.89
Flegel2:01.112:01.102:00.642:00.39
Clark2:02.552:01.842:01.332:01.60

The three big sedans finish within 0.28 seconds of each other over a two-mile lap — Interceptor 1:42.55, next year’s Interceptor 1:42.60, Intrepid 1:42.83. On a course this long that is close to a dead heat. The Impala was 2.1 seconds behind the Interceptor.

See the original page: the vehicle dynamics test data in the 2002 book
Scan of the vehicle dynamics lap times from the 2002 Michigan State Police test book: four laps by each of four drivers for six vehicles, with the overall averages
“Vehicle Dynamics Testing”, the lap-time table. Michigan State Police, 2002 Model Year Police Vehicle Evaluation Program, PDF page 35 (printed page 20). Open full size.
What went wrong during testing — the report’s own disclosures

The Camaro broke. Under its heading for the dynamics test at Grattan, the book records that the primary test car’s transmission failed, that MSP staff and Chevrolet personnel had a back-up Camaro safety inspected, equipped and prepared, and that “The test was completed using this alternate vehicle.” The acceleration, top-speed and braking runs had been made on the Saturday at the proving grounds; the book does not say which car made them.

The 2003 Police Interceptor’s ABS failed twice. It went down during the third test driver’s run. Ford and MSP staff together could not diagnose what had happened. The system was reset, the run repeated without trouble, and then it failed again during the fourth driver’s run — at which point the driver was instructed to continue with the ABS inactive.

A three-hour rain delay. The dynamics session at Grattan was delayed all morning and run in the afternoon once the track dried, using what the report calls the team’s new testing equipment.

The Hummer couldn’t reach the heat-up speed. Its brake conditioning runs were made at 75 mph rather than the standard 90, because the vehicle is unable to attain 90.

Fuel figures for the 2003 Interceptor were not yet available. Its EPA line reads TBD, “Not available until March 2002”.

Ergonomics, communications and fuel

Source: 2002 Model Year Police Vehicle Evaluation Program. Totals over 28 attributes graded 1 to 10 by ten officers, with the installation portion assessed by the MSP Communications Division and Vehicle and Travel Services. Both categories are scored on the same scale and listed together by score. City fuel economy to the nearest tenth is the figure scored for the police category; the special-service figures are the whole-number EPA city estimates on their description pages (printed pages 80–81), where the Excursion’s reads “N/A: Not required”.
VehicleCategoryErgonomics & communicationsEPA city (mpg)
Ford Excursion (4WD)Special service235.14N/A
Chevrolet Tahoe (2WD)Special service229.5615
Chevrolet Tahoe (4WD)Special service229.2314
Ford Expedition (4WD)Special service228.6312
Ford Crown Victoria (LWB)Special service223.3517
Ford Police Interceptor (2003)Police223.08TBD
Chevrolet ImpalaPolice221.6419.5
Ford Police Interceptor (2002)Police221.2615.5
Dodge IntrepidPolice218.3418.0
Ford Explorer (4WD)Special service210.7514
Dodge Durango (2WD)Special service206.4814
Dodge Durango (4WD)Special service205.1913
Chevrolet CamaroPolice161.9816.6
AM General HummerPolice154.409.0

Among the police-category vehicles, the 2003 Police Interceptor scores highest, at 223.08 — the highest police-category ergonomics score since the 1998 Tahoe’s 238.89, from the same car that missed its braking minimum. The Impala edges the 2002 Interceptor by 0.38 points, continuing an unbroken run since 2000, while returning four more miles per gallon in the city.

The Camaro’s departing scores include 1.50 out of ten for rear-seat entry and exit and 2.00 for rear legroom. The Hummer took 3.50 for front-seat entry and exit and 3.90 for its outside mirror controls.

What 2002 settled

Dodge came back and the pursuit Camaro went away in the same test. The Intrepid ran 135 mph, faster than both Police Interceptors, and lapped within three tenths of the Ford over two miles — and then fell short of its braking minimum by four hundredths of a foot per second squared on its first official outing. The Camaro left with a 14.14-second quarter mile at 102.48 mph, the quickest by a car in the books held here to that point.

And the year’s most consequential vehicle is one with no data at all. General Motors brought a Tahoe as an unpublished prototype and Michigan told its readers why it mattered: it was “of particular interest because it would be a pursuit rated SUV for the future”. Three model years later the Tahoe PPV was in the police category.

Source. Michigan State Police, 2002 Model Year Police Vehicle Evaluation Program, published by the MSP Training Division, October 2001, prepared by Ms. Betsy DeFeyter, Precision Driving Unit; it carries the National Institute of Justice and NLECTC pages. Acceleration, top speed and braking at the DaimlerChrysler Proving Grounds, September 15, 2001; vehicle dynamics at Grattan Raceway Park. Program contact Sgt. David “Doc” Halliday, MSP Precision Driving Unit. All figures transcribed directly from the report. See the record at the National Institute of Justice, and how these videos are researched.